The Full Melchett

1 min
read
December 30, 2020
Print Friendly and PDF
Print Friendly and PDF
Back

In a tiresomely predictable piece of policy-based evidence-making, the UK authorities have continued to use their self appropriated powers to put almost all of the UK into their new Tier 4, which is lockdown by any other name, although importantly an actual lockdown would require parliamentary approval, an irritating inconvenience for the Public Health Taliban that they have sought to avoid as much as possible. The latest restrictions, which seem likely to finally bankrupt much of the private sector hospitality industry, were justified by the tired old references to the NHS being overwhelmed – even as the multi million pound Nightingale Hospitals remained either unused or -even more bizarrely – decommissioned having never been used.

The timing is no coincidence, having moved the New Forest (where I am currently trying to work from) from Tier 2 to Tier 3 on Boxing day, we now find it moved to the highest level (for now) of Tier 4 within 4 days, when obviously there is no way in which there could be any ‘new’ data to justify this (not that there was for Tier 3 in any event). It is clear that this was a pre-planned policy position to put London into Lockdown for Christmas and then the rest of the country for New Year and the SPI-B propaganda unit have just been managing ‘the narrative’ to pretend that it is evidence leading policy, rather than the other way around.

“The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.”
Albert Einstein

In effect, the UK has “gone the Full Melchett” (worth revisiting this post for a clip of General Melchett at his most amusingly insane) and are persisting with their ‘policy’ of lockdown. Thus despite all evidence to the contrary, they are seeking to ‘control the virus’ by suspending all social contact until, apparently, we can all be injected with a vaccine that is only claiming to limit the effect of the virus rather than control its spread. This is the equivalent of the insanity of World War 1 Generals and their obsession with trench warfare. One has to hope that this doesn’t last the two and a half years it took them to learn the lessons of the battle of the Somme.

On the basis of what the drug company claim the virus can do, we should be using the vaccine to protect the vulnerable by reducing the fatality rate, but instead we appear to be giving it to ‘key workers’ who have so far either had the virus and recovered or show no signs of being susceptible to it. Perhaps this is an example of Hanlon’s Razor – that we should not attribute to malice what is better attributed to stupidity – but one has to be suspicious of the claims that the whole population now need to be vaccinated in order to achieve herd immunity, since with deep irony, herd immunity is a concept from the world of vaccines that has so far been comprehensively ‘rubbished’ by the propagandists. Indeed, the whole thrust of the lockdown of the healthy to somehow protect the vulnerable has been to claim that herd immunity doesn’t work!

So just to be clear, the healthy being infected by the virus itself and thus developing herd immunity so as ultimately to protect the vulnerable is apparently a bad idea, even though the overwhelming majority of those infected are either asymptomatic or suffer only a mild illness. Hence they must be locked up, forced to wear masks and socially distance so as not to kill granny. Equally, injecting only the vulnerable with a vaccine so as to reduce the infection fatality rate (which is in any event now similar to seasonal flu) is not in fact the purpose of the vaccine, even though that is what it is designed to do. Apparently, the vaccine is actually going to be used in a way that it claims no efficacy for, which is to inject the healthy as some sort of protection against transmission, something it clearly says it doesn’t do. So we are spending billions of pounds to inject otherwise healthy people with an untried vaccine that doesn’t achieve what we claim we are trying to achieve, while not giving priority to those whom it does actually help. In the meantime, the pointless trench warfare against shops and the hospitality industry as well as the gig economy goes on.

General Melchett would be proud.

Continue Reading

Market Thinking May 2024

After a powerful run from q4 2023, equities paused in April, with many of the momentum stocks simply running out of, well, momentum and leading many to revisit the old adage of 'Sell in May'. Meanwhile, sentiment in the bond markets soured further as the prospect of rate cuts receded - although we remain of the view that the main purpose of rate cuts now is to ensure the stability of bond markets themselves. The best performance once again came from China and Hong Kong as these markets start a (long delayed) catch up as distressed sellers are cleared from the markets. Markets are generally trying to establish some trading ranges for the summer months and while foreign policy is increasingly bellicose as led by politicians facing re-election as well as the defence and energy sector lobbyists, western trade lobbyists are also hard at work, erecting tariff barriers and trying to co-opt third parties to do the same. While this is not good for their own consumers, it is also fighting the reality of high quality, much cheaper, products coming from Asian competitors, most of whom are not also facing high energy costs. Nor is a strong dollar helping. As such, many of the big global companies are facing serious competition in third party markets and investors, also looking to diversify portfolios, are starting to look at their overseas competitors.

Market Thinking April 2024

The rally in asset markets in Q4 has evolved into a new bull market for equities, but not for bonds, which remain in a bear phase, facing problems with both demand and supply. As such the greatest short term uncertainty and medium term risk for asset prices remains another mishap in the fixed income markets, similar to the funding crisis of last September or the distressed selling feedback loop of SVB last March. US monetary authorities are monitoring this closely. Meanwhile, politics is likely to cloud the narrative over the next few quarters with the prospect of some changes to both energy policy and foreign policy having knock on implications for markets/

You're now leaving the Market Thinking website

Please note that you are about to leave the website of Market Thinking and be redirected to Toscafund Hong Kong. For further information, please contact Toscafund Hong Kong.

ACCEPT